They're nothing new. They are part and parcel of being a published author and, if there is one thing I've learned after seven years of writing and being published, you are bound to get one - or two.
You know something?
They still hurt.
Even with all of the advice I've received about bad reviews and the knowledge that you can't please everyone all of the time, there are occasions when the bad review cuts - and cuts deep.
(image credit: Goodreads.)
Of course, one nexus where authors can almost be guaranteed of seeing bad reviews of their work is Goodreads. The Amazon owned, global hub of just about any book that has ever been published is either a blessing or a curse for the working author.
I still haven't decided which.
Sure, it's a platform that gives exposure to an author's work, allows discussion and interaction about that work and literature more broadly.
In the past couple of weeks, some reviews have appeared on the Goodreads entry for The Recipient that are less than kind. In a word - they suck. I won't relay the details of them for you here. You can visit the entry for yourself and check them out. Suffice to say, there are no positive take aways in them. There is nothing in them that I could use to apply to better myself as a writer. Over the course of several hundred words, their basic take-home is, 'This is shit. Move on.'
You maybe asking, why would you do this to yourself Dean? Why would you visit a site like Goodreads, if you know that the reviews may not all be good?
Well - because reviews matter. Reviews are still the pre-dominant indicator of an individuals decision to purchase or not to purchase. If the reviews are bad, and they come from a reviewer of influence, that is quite a powerful position to be in.
I've had plenty of advice, saying to avoid reviews - good and bad - and I know, intellectually, that is the right thing to do.
But sometimes, I have moments of weakness. I've had a few moments of weakness recently.
I'm close to a stage of burn out. I've recently had two patients at my work pass who I were really close to and I think they affected me more than I am willing to admit. There has a constant pressure associated with the daily grind. Work, the school run, the weekend sports, juggling the house hold budget, my health. Not to mention the challenges of trying to remain creative and finish a story that I've committed quite a lot to emotionally over the past year.
I missed a pressure release valve somewhere along the way.
In those moments, I find myself indulging in a crazy little game of self flagellation. There is something about bad reviews that is strangely attractive. It's almost like, seeing a bad review acts as a sort of leveler. That, even after multiple titles, you're not actually top stuff at all. You're not even decent. You're a fraud.
(image credit: REUTERS/Mohammad Ismail.)
The best place, it seems, to do that is by visiting Goodreads and checking up on your reviews. Ignore the good reviews and go straight for bad ones and bask in them like some strung out drug addict.
Feels good, don't it.
I've endeavored to adhere to the idea that all reviews are valuable. All reviews offer something that an author can use to better themselves. Truth is, not all reviews are helpful. In fact, there are actually bad, bad reviews.
And it still hurts.
It sounds like the Good Reads site, is the Equivalent of the Lonely Planets Books on Travel.I wouldn't take any notice of Lonely Planet reviews, as they are Totally Shit, Dean.I don't know who writes them, or if they do Travel to all the Places they comment on,as they are so 'Off the Planet" descriptions, of the area, I wonder if they actually visit them at all.Same for Reviews on Books.Don't flog yourself over them Dean.ReplyDelete
Meg and Molly
It must be very tough. I know as a book reviewer, I struggle to write negative things about a book, but I also think that if I have felt something throughout reading it that was not 100% positive, it is part of being an honest reviewer to say so. By nature, I am not one to tear someone down, but I am also a pedantic reader (which I am sure you well know now!!), so it is hard to completely ignore something when I come to write a review. I think it is easy for some people to forget there is a body behind the name on the book and they let their frustrations out without thinking it through. I always feel horrible about saying something about the editing of one of your books in a review, even though my overall opinion is that your books are amazing. I know reviews sway me a fair bit when I come to choose a book to read, but at the same time, I use my own judgement to weigh up whether the blurb/author/genre etc appeal to me, because everyone is going to read it differently. I think all authors are amazing to stand up to it all, and if I ever (dream on!) publish something, I hope my reviews are half as good as yours (because let's be honest, there is a BUNCH of great opinions about your books out there because they ARE great books!).ReplyDelete